Michael Taussig, “The Language of Flowers”, Walter Benjamin’s Grave, Chicago: The University of Chicago press, 2006, pp. 189-218.
In this text Taussig begins to unravel the complex relationship between art and nature. The discussion is concentrated around flowers then, at one point, begins to investigate the relationship between flowers and disaster. An instance of this can be seen in the response to the 2001 attack on the world trade centre when flowers where laid layers deep at the site of the tragedy - a reaction when one does not know how to react. It is an example of how ‘when disaster strikes the useless becomes useful’ (Taussig 12). Flowers don’t have any inherent function yet they have an important and relevant purpose.
Often the occurrence of such a disaster leads people to search for hope and to make meaning. Flowers are a manifestation of a response which has moved through different states. Flowers have a poignant simplicity and beauty, a ‘contrast to the toughness all around them’ (Stewart 2). A reaction when no words are apt, they symbolise an exchange outside economy. A symbol and an expression of grief, of community, of loss and of hope all rolled into one.
A parallel experience exists in art as it is also inherently useless yet, because of this very quality, it is rendered powerful. Art has the ability to address the important issues; it communicates in a space predominantly outside of language and has the ability to be a gesture that can memorialise a situation.
Michael Taussig, “The Language of Flowers”, Walter Benjamin’s Grave, Chicago: The University of Chicago press, 2006, pp. 189-218.
Stewart, Barbara, “Even the Delicate Survive”, The New York Times 22 Sept. 2001: 1-2. Print.